[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461EE9E5.6060403@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:24:37 -0700
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...are.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] i386 - pte update optimizations
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>> Some PTE optimizations for native and paravirt-ops kernels; this
>> provides a huge win for shadow mode hypervisors and gets rid of
>> some unnecessary atomic instructions in native kernels, saving
>> even more on UP by getting rid of implicit LOCK on xchg instruction.
>
> You do know that P6 and higher don't do locked bus references as long
> as the value is in the cache, right?
Yes. Even then, last time I clocked instructions, xchg was still slower
than read / write, although I could be misremembering. And it's not
totally clear that they will always be in cached state, however, and for
SMP, we still want to drop the implicit lock in cases where the
processor might not know they are cached exclusive, but we know there
are no other racing users. And there are plenty of old processors out
there to still make it worthwhile.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists