[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070413043140.GA9431@arun.site>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:01:40 +0530
From: Milind Arun Choudhary <milindchoudhary@...il.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
discuss@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [KJ][PATCH 02/03]ROUND_UP|DOWN macro cleanup in arch/ia64,x86_64
On 14:13 Thu 12 Apr , Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:01:40AM +0530, Milind Arun Choudhary wrote:
> > - size = ROUNDUP(size, iovp_size);
> > + size = ALIGN(size, iovp_size);
>
> Why is "ALIGN" better than "ROUNDUP"? I can't see any point
> to this change.
Its a janitorial work. I'm trying to celanup
all the corners where ROUNDUP/DOWN & likes are defined.
Kernel.h currently has macros like ALIGN roundup DIV_ROUND_UP.
in this patch series I've added ALIGN_DOWN & round_down
[waiting for comments on the same.]
So as ALIGN macro does the same work as ROUNDUP,
is at a common place
& is accessible to everyone
it should be used instead...i think
--
Milind Arun Choudhary
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists