linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] make kthread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070414180247.GA504@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:02:47 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] make kthread_stop() scalable

On 04/13, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> writes:
> 
> > It's a shame kthread_stop() (may take a while!) runs with a global semaphore
> > held. With this patch kthread() allocates all neccesary data (struct kthread)
> > on its own stack, globals kthread_stop_xxx are deleted.
> 
> Oleg so fare you patches  have been inspiring.  However..
> 
> > HACKS:
> >
> > 	- re-use task_struct->set_child_tid to point to "struct kthread"
> 
> 	 task_struct->vfork_done is a better cannidate.
> 
> > 	- use do_exit() directly to preserve "struct kthread" on stack
> 
> Calling do_exit directly like that is not a hack, as it appears the preferred
> way to exit is to call do_exit, or complete_and_exit.
> 
> While this does improve the scalability and remove a global variable.  It
> also introduces a complex special case in the form of struct kthread.

I can't say I agree. I thought it is good to have a struct which represents
a kernel thread. Actually, I thought we can have __kthread_create() which
returns "struct kthread". May be I am wrong, because yes, ->set_child_tid can
point right to completion, and we can use some TIF flag instead of ->should_stop.
This needs to update a lot of include/asm/ files.

> It also doesn't solve the biggest problem with the current kthread interface
> in that calling kthread_stop does not cause the code to break out of
> interruptible sleeps.

Hm? kthread_stop() does wake_up_process(), it wakes up TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE tasks.

> > @@ -91,7 +105,7 @@ static void create_kthread(struct kthrea
> >
> >  	/* We want our own signal handler (we take no signals by default). */
> >  	pid = kernel_thread(kthread, create, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | SIGCHLD);
> > -	create->result = pid;
> > +	create->result = ERR_PTR(pid);
> 
> Ouch.    You have a nasty race here.
> 
> If kthread runs before kernel_thread returns then setting
> "create->result = ERR_PTR(pid);" could easily stomp 
> "create->result = &self".

Yes, thanks... Can't understand how I was soooo stupid!!! thanks...

Damn. We don't need 2 completions! just one.

	create_kthread:

		pid = kernel_thread(...);
		if (pid < 0) {
			create->result = ERR_PTR(pid);
			complete(create->started);
		}
		// else: kthread() will do complete()

		return;

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/