[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5A4D6434-3DF2-4CC7-B363-260E5F945F72@silverinsanity.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:15:00 -0400
From: Brian Gernhardt <benji@...verinsanity.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, git@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GIT and the current -stable
On Apr 14, 2007, at 4:34 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> I've already put a tree like this up on kernel.org. The master branch
> is Linus' tree, and there's branches for each of the stable releases
> called linux-2.6.[12-20].y (I didn't add 2.6.11.y).
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6-
> stable.git;a=summary
Is HEAD for that repo the most recent stable branch, or (as gitweb
makes it look) Linus's head. I'd expect a "-stable" repo to point at
the most recent stable commit, not the most recent development
commit. And I'd also expect gitweb's summary page to show the
shortlog for HEAd. One of my assumptions are being broken and I
don't like it. It leaves me all confused...
(I'd just clone your repo and look for myself, but I'm still pulling
Linus's tree for the first time and I don't have a fast connection.)
~~ Brian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists