[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1176658335.6364.11.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:32:15 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, hui Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair
Scheduler [CFS]
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 16:08 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Ingo could have publicly spoken with them about his ideas of killing
> > the O(1) scheduler and replacing it with an rbtree-based one, and using
> > part of Bill's work to speed up development.
>
> He did exactly that and he did it with a patch. Nothing new here. This is
> how development on LKML proceeds when you have two or more competing
> designs. There's absolutely no need to get upset or hurt your feelings
> over it. It's not malicious, it's how we do Linux development.
Yes. Exactly. This is what it's all about, this is what makes it work.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists