linux-kernel - Re: Performance Stats: Kernel patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070415201024.GB12012@ucw.cz>
Date:	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:10:24 +0000
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc:	Maxim Uvarov <muvarov@...mvista.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	davidsen@....com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com, dada1@...mosbay.com,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, jesper.juhl@...il.com
Subject: Re: Performance Stats: Kernel patch

Hi!

On Sun 2007-04-15 03:21:57, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> At some point in the past, someone's attribution was stripped from:

Maxim's.

> >> +       return buffer + sprintf(buffer, "Nvcsw:\t%lu\n"
> >> +                           "Nivcsw:\t%lu\n",
> >> +                           p->nvcsw,
> >> +                           p->nivcsw);
> 
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 09:47:07AM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > We don't encrypt variable names like this.
> 
> nvcsw and nivcsw are conventional variable names for these quantities.

I can't decipher them and would not want users see them in /proc.


Would nonvoluntary_ctxt_switch be that much worse?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/