[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1176623688.30350.23.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:54:48 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair
Scheduler [CFS]
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 15:01 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Well, I'll stop heating the room for now as I get out of ideas about how
> to defeat it. I'm convinced. I'm impatient to read about Mike's feedback
> with his workload which behaves strangely on RSDL. If it works OK here,
> it will be the proof that heuristics should not be needed.
You mean the X + mp3 player + audio visualization test? X+Gforce
visualization have problems getting half of my box in the presence of
two other heavy cpu using tasks. Behavior is _much_ better than
RSDL/SD, but the synchronous nature of X/client seems to be a problem.
With this scheduler, renicing X/client does cure it, whereas with SD it
did not help one bit. (I know a trivial way to cure that, and this
framework makes that possible without dorking up fairness as a general
policy.)
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists