[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070413155949.GA9157@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:59:50 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, lenb@...nel.org,
"linux-acpi@...r" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful
Hi!
> > Are you _sure_ you have a 1-to-1 relationship here? No multiple devices
> > pointing to the same acpi node? Or the other way around? If so, you
> > are going to have to change the name to be something more unique.
>
> I've wondered that too. The short answer: APCI only supports 1-1
> here. It will emit warnings if it tries to bind more than one ACPI
...
> Assuming they all adopt that same "parallel tree" model, that seems
> like a good idea. The tools will likely need to understand how ACPI
> and OF differ, but there's no point in reserving more names than we
> really need. Though it may be that "parallel trees" should go away.
If mapping is indeed 1-to-1 in acpi... it would be nice to just merge
the trees.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists