[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020704150339i4a0d437fja6868ab671558ba1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:39:27 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "hui Bill Huey" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>,
"ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>,
"Peter Williams" <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
On 4/15/07, hui Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> The perception here is that there is that there is this expectation that
> sections of the Linux kernel are intentionally "churn squated" to prevent
> any other ideas from creeping in other than of the owner of that subsytem
Strangely enough, my perception is that Ingo is simply trying to
address the issues Mike's testing discovered in RDSL and SD. It's not
surprising Ingo made it a separate patch set as Con has repeatedly
stated that the "problems" are in fact by design and won't be fixed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists