lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:39:27 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi> To: "hui Bill Huey" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>, "ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>, "Peter Williams" <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>, "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] On 4/15/07, hui Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org> wrote: > The perception here is that there is that there is this expectation that > sections of the Linux kernel are intentionally "churn squated" to prevent > any other ideas from creeping in other than of the owner of that subsytem Strangely enough, my perception is that Ingo is simply trying to address the issues Mike's testing discovered in RDSL and SD. It's not surprising Ingo made it a separate patch set as Con has repeatedly stated that the "problems" are in fact by design and won't be fixed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists