[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704151604520.7215@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:08:08 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
cc: hui Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair
Scheduler [CFS]
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Ingo could have publicly spoken with them about his ideas of killing
> the O(1) scheduler and replacing it with an rbtree-based one, and using
> part of Bill's work to speed up development.
He did exactly that and he did it with a patch. Nothing new here. This is
how development on LKML proceeds when you have two or more competing
designs. There's absolutely no need to get upset or hurt your feelings
over it. It's not malicious, it's how we do Linux development.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists