linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] Hardware monitoring subsystem maintainer positionis open

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:07:15 -0400
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To:	lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Cc:	Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@....nl>,
	Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...pl>,
	"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@...htlink.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Hardware monitoring subsystem maintainer	positionis open

Hi,

On Thursday 12 April 2007 03:27, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Krzysztof Helt wrote:
> 
> >> * Must follow kernel coding style guidelines
> > 
> > Is there any tool to check this? If there is one, a basic
> > instruction how to use it would be great.
> > 
> 
> No tool.

Passing new drivres through scripts/Lindent and analyzing the
dirrerences can highlight differences between kernel style and
author's (note that I do not advocate mechanically passing
everything though Lindent).

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/