linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Check for error returned by kthread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070416111026.GA22116@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:10:26 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, sct@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for error returned by kthread_create on creating journal thread

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:10:42PM +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:41:14AM +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> >> If the thread failed to create the subsequent wait_event
> >> will hang forever.
> >>
> >> This is likely to happen if kernel hits max_threads limit.
> >>
> >> Will be critical for virtualization systems that limit the
> >> number of tasks and kernel memory usage within the container.
> > 
> >> --- ./fs/jbd/journal.c.jbdthreads	2007-04-16 11:17:36.000000000 +0400
> >> +++ ./fs/jbd/journal.c	2007-04-16 11:30:09.000000000 +0400
> >> @@ -211,10 +211,16 @@ end_loop:
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -static void journal_start_thread(journal_t *journal)
> >> +static int journal_start_thread(journal_t *journal)
> >>  {
> >> -	kthread_run(kjournald, journal, "kjournald");
> >> +	struct task_struct *t;
> >> +
> >> +	t = kthread_run(kjournald, journal, "kjournald");
> >> +	if (IS_ERR(t))
> >> +		return PTR_ERR(t);
> >> +
> >>  	wait_event(journal->j_wait_done_commit, journal->j_task != 0);
> > 
> > Note that this wait_event should exist at all, and the return
> 
> Should NOT you mean?

Umm, yes - of course :)

> > value of kthread_run should be assigned to journal->j_task.  Also
> > the code doesn't use the kthread primitives in other places leading
> > to crufty code.
> 
> Well, this could be done with a separate patch, I think.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/