linux-kernel - Re: [NFS] Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:48:49 -0400
From:	"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com>
To:	"James Lentini" <jlentini@...app.com>
Cc:	"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	chuck.lever@...cle.com, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
	"Roland Dreier" <rdreier@...co.com>, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Tom Tucker" <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>, Thomas.Talpey@...app.com,
	"Or Gerlitz" <ogerlitz@...taire.com>
Subject: Re: [NFS] Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.)

On 4/16/07, James Lentini <jlentini@...app.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in understanding why the reluctance to push for a merge
> > now (let alone some months ago) given the various successes that have
> > been seen with the NFS/RDMA effort (Sandia, SC '06, as Chuck noted:
> > good performance at various test sites).  If the code is holding up
> > well why the delay in review and merging?  And rather than wait for
> > the remaining transport switch patches; why not look to merge all of
> > NFS/RDMA (client) work at the same time?
>
> There is no reluctance to submit the NFS-RDMA code for review. There
> have been several upstream changes to the NFS server recently. We
> (NetApp and Tom Tucker at OGC) are working on a new patchset for
> NFS-RDMA that is compatible with these changes. We are testing the
> code now.
>
> We will post the patches for review when we finish updating them.

Thanks for the clarification.  It was unfair of me to imply any amount
of "reluctance" to submit the NFS/RDMA code for review.  I was just
trying to gauge the "real soon now" type posts we've seen over the
past few months.  If anything I'd imagine the latest NFS churn has
given you additional incentive to merge.

Thanks for your continued hard work; NFS/RDMA looks to be a huge
improvement for modern NFS deployments.

regards,
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/