linux-kernel - Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070416145527.GA26863@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:55:27 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Tomasz K?oczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Cc:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	"David R. Litwin" <presently42@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
> ZFS on Solaris provides for many workloads better speed than any Linux 
> technology on the same hardware but ZFS ond FUSE in current form provides 
> lower speed than now avalaible Linux technologies.

Numbers, please.  So far in all interesting benchmarks it actually
was slower.  But when they're faster than XFS somewhere I'd defintly
be interesting in looking at why this is true and if possible and
important enough fix it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/