[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m18xcsl3yc.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:43:55 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linuxram@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [patch 05/10] add "permit user mounts in new namespace" clone flag
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> writes:
> That depends. Current patches check the "unprivileged submounts
> allowed under this mount" flag only on the requested mount and not on
> the propagated mounts. Do you see a problem with this?
I think privileges of this sort should propagate. If I read what you
just said correctly if I have a private mount namespace I won't be able
to mount anything unless when it was setup the unprivileged submount
command was explicitly set.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists