linux-kernel - Re: [Patch -mm 0/3] RFC: module unloading vs. release function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070416185333.GA15188@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:53:33 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Patch -mm 0/3] RFC: module unloading vs. release function

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:36:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> based on the discussion in "How should an exit routine wait for
> release() callbacks?"

Wait, why is this needed anymore with the recent work in splitting sysfs
away from the backing code?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/