linux-kernel - Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1176712094.29389.191.camel@wirenth>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:28:14 +0100
From:	ian <spyro@....com>
To:	cbou@...l.ru
Cc:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@...reenet.org>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 07:12 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:

> Why? With current battery class we can do whatever everyone needs. No
> need for wrappers.

<cut>

> Because of your original design, simple batteries are stay simple, and
> no noticing that there is some "complicated" attributes exists at all.
> That's indeed great characteristic of that *universal* battery class.

Indeed. Im just trying to make sure we dont bloat an otherwise very
simple class. A word of caution only.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/