linux-kernel - Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1HdnvW-0005Ti-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:40:58 +1000
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	francis.moro@...il.com (Francis Moreau)
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, helge.hafting@...el.hist.no,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> > normal version:
>> > test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 67991 cycles (8192
>> > bytes)
>> >
>> > optimized version:
>> > test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 51783 cycles (8192
>> > bytes)
>> >
>> > So the gain is 16000 cycles which seems to worth the change, isn't it ?
>>
>> Sounds like it would.  It would help of course if you posted the patch :)
>>
> 
> OK, I tried to cook up something very simple. Since I don't know this
> code, please be indulgent when reading the following patch ;)

Actually, I was referring to your AES module :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/