| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0704170741n619e169s6a2f3ac5b768a950@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:41:00 +0200 From: "Francis Moreau" <francis.moro@...il.com> To: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Cc: helge.hafting@...el.hist.no, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ? On 4/17/07, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote: > Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com> wrote: > > On 4/17/07, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote: > >> > >> Actually, I was referring to your AES module :) > > > > Well I don't if I can do that unfortunately. > > What's the problem? > Always the same problem. Some stupid people here think that they have designed the most wonderful AES hardware module. If I give you the code of the driver I'll show you a lot of "confidential" stuff. > > Actually there's nothing really interesting in this code, only key or > > acc loadings and that's it. > > > > What do you want to see exactly ? > > Well if your code's faster than what we have in the kernel then we > should use yours instead. > Again, my code is faster only because I skip the key loading in "cia_encrypt" method. Actually the gain is bigger in decryption mode than in encryption one because I also generate the decryption key for each block. You see there's absolutely no clever trick here... -- Francis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists