linux-kernel - Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adairbv57s2.fsf@cisco.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:40:13 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	"Francis Moreau" <francis.moro@...il.com>
Cc:	"Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	helge.hafting@...el.hist.no, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

 > Again, my code is faster only because I skip the key loading in 
 > "cia_encrypt" method. Actually the gain is bigger in decryption mode 
 > than in encryption one because I also generate the decryption key for 
 > each block.

I wonder if there's some way you can cache the last caller and reload
the key lazily (only when it changes).  Of course without your code
it's hard to say...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/