[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170fa0d20704170902i5779f5cv669013fea151f90c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:02:28 -0400
From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com>
To: ian.murdock@....com, "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Tomasz Kłoczko" <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>,
"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
"David R. Litwin" <presently42@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea
On 4/17/07, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > So who is responsible for potential changing Linux code licensing for
> > allow if not incorporate CDDL code correct interraction without breaking
> > some law ?
>
> Every single contributor, individually. Which won't happen.
>
> The real test of whether Sun were serious about ZFS being anywhere but
> Solaris is what they do to license it - they've patented everything they
> can, and made the code available only under licenses incompatible with
> other OS products. Their intent is quite clear, and quite sad.
>
> Compare it to what the old Sun company did with NFS, which is now a
> standard used everywhere.
>
> If Sun want ZFS to get used all over the place in free software then I'd
> have expected at the very least to see them throw out a copy of the code,
> docs and patent grant in a form that could be used, even if it came with
> no other assistance of any kind. Now would be a great time to do that,
> but I can't see it happening, instead they'll miss the boat just as
> microsoft did with Office XML (three years ago they'd have sailed it
> through ISO to the sound of fanfairs)
Maybe Ian Murdock could weigh in on this given his new position at Sun. Ian?
BTW, congrats on the new gig...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists