linux-kernel - Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704171929.00258.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:29:00 +0300
From:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Anyone who thinks that there exists only two kinds of code: 100% correct
> and 100% incorrect with no shades of grey inbetween is in reality a sort
> of an extremist: whom, depending on mood and affection, we could call
> either a 'coding purist' or a 'coding taliban' ;-)

I am not sure what you mean by this?!?

It's probably well known that nothing is perfect, even if you tried, but to 
use this to excuse sub-optimal coding sounds rather lame.

Now, admitting that everything may be fixable, would have been a much more 
reasonable response.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/