linux-kernel - Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704171318.22758.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:18:22 -0400
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

On Tuesday 17 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
>> > ok, i've got something better to test: i separated the delta out
>> > into a more finegrained stack of 3 patches. You can pick them up
>> > from:
>> >
>> >  http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0.patch
>> > 
>> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-preempt-fi
>> >x.patch
>> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-child-runs
>> >-first.patch
>> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/older/sched-cfs-v2-rc0-misc.patch
>>
>> Isn't that easier for everyone if you keep them as quilt series (ala
>> syslets)?
>
>i _do_ have a quilt tree, but i never had the clean splitup above. Why?
>Because i worked on all of these aspects (and a whole lot of other
>aspects as well) in parallel during the past 2 days, back and forth,
>often mixing changes, etc. and there was never any clean splitup.
>
>Now it turned out that the clean splitup of -rc0->final delta would ease
>Gene's testing so i created it. Note that this is just 30% of the total
>v1->v2 delta and i just saved the work of having to do a clean splitup
>of the other 70%. (and note that this splitup will be undone because it
>makes no sense for any potential upstream merge at all, it's only to
>ease testing for Gene)

Now he tells me.  :-)  But I have some CHO stuff to do, so it will be about 36 
hours before I can get back to this.

>	Ingo



-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Support the Girl Scouts!
	(Today's Brownie is tomorrow's Cookie!)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/