[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070417200553.GO2986@holomorphy.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:05:53 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: James Bruce <bruce@...rew.cmu.edu>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
hui Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:07:49AM -0400, James Bruce wrote:
> Nonlinear is a must IMO. I would suggest X = exp(ln(10)/10) ~= 1.2589
> That value has the property that a nice=10 task gets 1/10th the cpu of a
> nice=0 task, and a nice=20 task gets 1/100 of nice=0. I think that
> would be fairly easy to explain to admins and users so that they can
> know what to expect from nicing tasks.
[...additional good commentary trimmed...]
Lots of good ideas here. I'll follow them.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists