linux-kernel - Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070417004117.GA16513@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:41:17 +1000
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
Cc:	helge.hafting@...el.hist.no, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:37:01AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> 
> BTW, here are figures I got with 2 different versions of the driver
> when using tcrypt module. The second being the result with the
> optimized driver (no key reloading on each block):
> 
> normal version:
> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 67991 cycles (8192 
> bytes)
> 
> optimized version:
> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 51783 cycles (8192 
> bytes)
> 
> So the gain is 16000 cycles which seems to worth the change, isn't it ?

Sounds like it would.  It would help of course if you posted the patch :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/