[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46246D61.8010300@bigpond.net.au>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:46:57 +1000
From:	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this is the second release of the CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler) 
> patchset, against v2.6.21-rc7:
> 
>    http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.patch
> 
> i'd like to thank everyone for the tremendous amount of feedback and 
> testing the v1 patch got - i could hardly keep up with just reading the 
> mails! Some of the stuff people addressed i couldnt implement yet, i 
> mostly concentrated on bugs, regressions and debuggability.
Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of 
rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock?  This would take the nice 
value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when determining 
what's fair.
Peter
PS You'd have to change the migration thread's load_weight from 0 to 1 
in order to prevent divide by zero without having to explicitly check 
for it every time.
-- 
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@...pond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
  -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
