linux-kernel - Re: AppArmor FAQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Line.LNX.4.64.0704172214530.21996@d.namei>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:20:28 -0400 (EDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	David Wagner <daw@...berkeley.edu>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AppArmor FAQ

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, David Wagner wrote:

> These systems probably have different tradeoffs.  Consequently, it seems
> to me that arguing over whether SELinux is superior to AppArmor makes
> about as much sense as arguing over whether emacs is superior to vim,
> or whether Python is superior to Perl.  The answer is likely to be
> "it depends".

This is not what the discussion is about.  It's about addressing the many 
points in the FAQ posted here which are likely to cause misunderstandings, 
and then subsequent responses of a similar nature.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/