lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4626713B.1040206@nortel.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:27:55 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Mark Glines <mark@...nes.org>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely
 Fair Scheduler [CFS]

Mark Glines wrote:

> One minor question: is it even possible to be completely fair on SMP?
> For instance, if you have a 2-way SMP box running 3 applications, one of
> which has 2 threads, will the threaded app have an advantage here?  (The
> current system seems to try to keep each thread on a specific CPU, to
> reduce cache thrashing, which means threads and processes alike each
> get 50% of the CPU.)

I think the ideal in this case would be to have both threads on one cpu, 
with the other app on the other cpu.  This gives inter-process fairness 
while minimizing the amount of task migration required.

More interesting is the case of three processes on a 2-cpu system.  Do 
we constantly migrate one of them back and forth to ensure that each of 
them gets 66% of a cpu?

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ