[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070418211632.GA7610@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:16:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christian Hesse <mail@...thworm.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net
Subject: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
* Christian Hesse <mail@...thworm.de> wrote:
> > i took a quick look at suspend2 and it makes some use of yield().
> > There's a bug in CFS's yield code, i've attached a patch that should
> > fix it, does it make any difference to the hang?
>
> This patch should apply cleanly against what? The second hunk is
> ignored as it has already been applied. Is this correct?
hm, i think you might have had one of the earlier CFS patches.
> But no, it does not change anything. Let me know if you have any other
> patches to test.
could you try the -v3 patch i released a few hours ago:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/
although probably your suspend2 problem is still not fixed, it's worth a
try nevertheless. Which suspend2 patch did you apply, and was it against
-rc6 or -rc7?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists