linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sysctl_panic_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl_panic_on_oom broken

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Larry Woodman wrote:

> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:39 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> > 
> > It recreates the old problem that we OOM while we still have memory 
> > in other parts of the system.
> 
> How, by the time we get here we have already decided we are going to
> OOMkill or panic.  This change just obeys sysctl_panic_on_oom before
> killing current.

If you panic then there is no reason to kill current. Lets say you
have a 10 node system and the application attempt to allocate from node 8 
which has no reclaimable memory then the application has a problem not the 
system as a whole.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/