[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704172148490.31155@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Florin Iucha <florin@...ha.net>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Florin Iucha wrote:
>
> Already did. Traces from vanilla kernel at
> http://iucha.net/nfs/21-rc7/big-copy
Well, there's a pdflush in io_schedule_timeout/congestion_wait, and
there's a nfsv4-scv in svc_recv/nfs_callback_sv, and a lot of processes
either just in schedule_timeout or similar "normal" waiting (pollwait
etc).
[ The call traces could be prettier, but sadly, even if you enable frame
pointers, the x86-64 kernel is too stupid to follow them. So you kind of
just have to ignore the noise) ]
The triggering process looks like it might be that "cp", it is in the
__wait_on_bit/sync_page/wait_on_page_bit/wait_on_page_writeback_range/
filemap_fdatawait.
Is this a trace from the "big copy" hang, or from a gnome splashscreen
hang? It *looks* like it's a big copy. Yes/no?
Anyway, looks like the cp did a "utimes()" system call, which triggers
"nfs_setattr(), which in turn triggers the filemap_fdatawait() and some
kind of endless wait. Nothing stands out from the traces, in other words.
Doesn't look like a locking thing, for example - we're not stuck on some
inode semaphore, we're literally waiting for the page to be written out.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists