[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070418061330.GD23497@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:13:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gud@....net, arjan@...ux.intel.com, milindchoudhary@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED/RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED deprecation
* Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> Apparently it's not cool anymore to use SPIN/RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED. There's
> some mention of this in Documentation/spinlocks.txt, but that only
> talks about dynamic initialisation.
>
> A comment in the code mentioning the preferred usage would be good
> IMHO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
thanks,
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists