[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46276BE5.7020001@rtr.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:17:25 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Renice X for cpu schedulers
Con Kolivas wrote:
s go ahead and think up great ideas for other ways of metering out cpu
> bandwidth for different purposes, but for X, given the absurd simplicity of
> renicing, why keep fighting it? Again I reiterate that most users of SD have
> not found the need to renice X anyway except if they stick to old habits of
> make -j4 on uniprocessor and the like, and I expect that those on CFS and
> Nicksched would also have similar experiences.
Just plain "make" (no -j2 or -j9999) is enough to kill interactivity
on my 2GHz P-M single-core non-HT machine with SD.
But with the very first posted version of CFS by Ingo,
I can do "make -j2" no problem and still have a nicely interactive destop.
-ml
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists