[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070419152941.7c4b7ff2@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:29:41 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg K-H <greg@...ah.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFD] alternative kobject release wait mechanism
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:06:25 +0900,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> Heh heh, I'm amazed it actually works. Agreed that the list walking
> isn't pretty but adding completion to each kobject still feels like too
> much of overhead just for release waiting. Any better ideas?
Not really. But I'm more in favour on adding a new field than on adding
complicated code. (Although, the whole device infrastructure wouldn't
fare bad with some diet...)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists