linux-kernel - Re: why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070419181221.59c3c7bd@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:12:21 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Marat Buharov <marat.buharov@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:56:27 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:

> Marat Buharov wrote:
> > from fs/udf/super.c:
> > in function udf_fill_super
> > sb->s_maxbytes = 1<<30; (1 GB)
> > 
> > Why sb->s_maxbytes is not equal to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE?
> > 
> 
> Patches to fix that are in the -mm kernel already (and in
> Fedora Core 6 latest update.)

Good to know, presumably these also fix the underlying UDF problems in the
UDF filesystem code that caused it to be put there in the first pace ?

(Security CVE-2006-4145)

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/