[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Heafy-0006ia-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:44:10 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de,
dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] mm: count unstable pages per BDI
> Count per BDI unstable pages.
>
I'm wondering, is it really worth having this category separate from
per BDI brity pages?
With the exception of the export to sysfs, always the sum of unstable
+ dirty is used.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists