[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1HebEV-0004m9-00@calista.eckenfels.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:19:51 +0200
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@...a.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AppArmor FAQ
In article <Line.LNX.4.64.0704180935100.25495@...amei> you wrote:
> Perhaps -- until your httpd is compromised via a buffer overflow or
> simply misbehaves due to a software or configuration flaw, then the
> assumptions being made about its use of pathnames and their security
> properties are out the window.
Hu? Even a compromised httpd (especially a compromised httpd) is bound to
the app armor policies. This means it cannot (for example) write to
/var/www/* - if it never needed to at normal/profiling time.
Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists