linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a0a62dfc0704191148v15434469kc3130821cb251072@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:48:27 -0500
From:	"Adam Litke" <aglitke@...il.com>
To:	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
	"Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>, "Dave Chinner" <dgc@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages

On 4/19/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> @@ -331,11 +331,15 @@ int simple_prepare_write(struct file *fi
>                         unsigned from, unsigned to)
>  {
>         if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> -               if (to - from != PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> +               if (to - from != page_cache_size(file->f_mapping)) {

Where do you introduce page_cache_size()?  Is this added by a
different set of patches I should have applied first?

--
Adam Litke ( agl at us.ibm.com )
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/