[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1177009236.7066.19.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:00:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de, dgc@....com,
tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] mm: count unstable pages per BDI
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 20:46 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 20:12 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 19:44 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > Count per BDI unstable pages.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm wondering, is it really worth having this category separate from
> > > per BDI brity pages?
> > >
> > > With the exception of the export to sysfs, always the sum of unstable
> > > + dirty is used.
> >
> > I guess you are right, but it offends my sense of aesthetics to break
> > symmetry with the zone statistics. However, it has the added advantage
> > of only needing 2 deltas as well.
>
> I guess, this should do.
OK, the compiler told me I messed up :-/. I'll respin the whole series
and repost tomorrow or something...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists