[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4627CB04.4060401@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:03:16 +0200
From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, perex@...e.cz,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions
Hi Takashi,
Takashi Iwai napisaĆ(a):
> At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:44:57 -0400,
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
>>>
>>> Subject : snd_intel8x0: divide error: 0000
>>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/5/252
>>> Submitter : Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
>>> Status : unknown
>>>
>> Oops is in sound/pci/intel8x0.c::snd_intel8x0_update(), part of
>> the interrupt handler:
>>
>> Line 751:
>>
>> ichdev->position += step * ichdev->fragsize1;
>> if (! chip->in_measurement)
>> ichdev->position %= ichdev->size;
>>
>> ichdev->size is 0. Interrupt happened upon request_irq().
>>
>> Does chip->in_measurement need to be reset because this is a
>> crashdump kernel?
>
> No, the problem seems to be the timing of request_irq() and the
> initialization of hardware. The irq handler shouldn't get called
> there at all.
>
> How about the patch below?
>
>
> Takashi
>
> diff -r 4b6ed4ef4820 sound/pci/intel8x0.c
> --- a/sound/pci/intel8x0.c Mon Apr 16 19:20:17 2007 +0200
> +++ b/sound/pci/intel8x0.c Tue Apr 17 11:02:49 2007 +0200
> @@ -2493,6 +2493,7 @@ static int intel8x0_resume(struct pci_de
> return -EIO;
> }
> pci_set_master(pci);
> + snd_intel8x0_chip_init(chip, 0);
> if (request_irq(pci->irq, snd_intel8x0_interrupt,
> IRQF_SHARED, card->shortname, chip)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "intel8x0: unable to grab IRQ %d, "
> @@ -2502,7 +2503,6 @@ static int intel8x0_resume(struct pci_de
> }
> chip->irq = pci->irq;
> synchronize_irq(chip->irq);
> - snd_intel8x0_chip_init(chip, 0);
>
> /* re-initialize mixer stuff */
> if (chip->device_type == DEVICE_INTEL_ICH4 && !spdif_aclink) {
> @@ -2862,16 +2862,7 @@ static int __devinit snd_intel8x0_create
> ICH_REG_ALI_INTERRUPTSR : ICH_REG_GLOB_STA;
> chip->int_sta_mask = int_sta_masks;
>
> - /* request irq after initializaing int_sta_mask, etc */
> - if (request_irq(pci->irq, snd_intel8x0_interrupt,
> - IRQF_SHARED, card->shortname, chip)) {
> - snd_printk(KERN_ERR "unable to grab IRQ %d\n", pci->irq);
> - snd_intel8x0_free(chip);
> - return -EBUSY;
> - }
> - chip->irq = pci->irq;
> pci_set_master(pci);
> - synchronize_irq(chip->irq);
>
> switch(chip->device_type) {
> case DEVICE_INTEL_ICH4:
> @@ -2900,6 +2891,15 @@ static int __devinit snd_intel8x0_create
> snd_intel8x0_free(chip);
> return err;
> }
> +
> + /* request irq after initializaing int_sta_mask, etc */
> + if (request_irq(pci->irq, snd_intel8x0_interrupt,
> + IRQF_SHARED, card->shortname, chip)) {
> + snd_printk(KERN_ERR "unable to grab IRQ %d\n", pci->irq);
> + snd_intel8x0_free(chip);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + chip->irq = pci->irq;
>
> if ((err = snd_device_new(card, SNDRV_DEV_LOWLEVEL, chip, &ops)) < 0) {
> snd_intel8x0_free(chip);
>
This patch solves the problem for me. Thanks!
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group (PL)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
LTG - Linux Testers Group (EN)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/linux_testers_group_en/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists