[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070419195957.GF11115@waste.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:59:57 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...te.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 20/20] Add apply_to_page_range() which applies a function to a pte range.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:44:57PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > I think adding a flags field and an allocate flag to my callback
> > struct would be sufficient here.
> >
>
> Yes, probably.
>
> What about something that wants to shatter superpages?
Haven't thought a huge amount about that. Perhaps it's best done with
the level 3 callback?
> Don't know that that's a huge concern. The typedef namespace (*_t) is
> pretty empty, and its not like we're talking about something that's
> visible outside the kernel. And the syntax is *really* ugly.
Don't really care about this much.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists