| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:08:34 -0400 (EDT) From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> To: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> cc: David Wagner <daw-usenet@...erner.cs.berkeley.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: AppArmor FAQ On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote: > Lastly, if you want to judge AA as a jail mechanism, I think you'll find > it fails there too. So where does that leave it? An easy-to-use yet > inadequate solution for MAC or jail. It's not easy to use. -- James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists