[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704181634220.25880@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair
Scheduler [CFS]
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > "Perhaps on the rare occasion pursuing the right course demands an act of
> > unfairness, unfairness itself can be the right course?"
>
> I don't think that's the right issue.
>
> It's just that "fairness" != "equal".
>
> Do you think it "fair" to pay everybody the same regardless of how good a
> job they do? I don't think anybody really believes that.
>
> Equating "fair" and "equal" is simply a very fundamental mistake. They're
> not the same thing. Never have been, and never will.
I know, we agree there. But that did not fit my "Pirates of the Caribbean" quote :)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists