linux-kernel - [PATCH] drivers/base/attribute_container.c: use mutex instead of binary semaphore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070419211600.GH5013@traven>
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:16:00 +0200
From:	Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com>
To:	gregkh@...e.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/base/attribute_container.c: use mutex instead of binary semaphore

use mutex instead of binary semaphore in
drivers/base/attribute_container.c

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com> 

--

diff --git a/drivers/base/attribute_container.c b/drivers/base/attribute_container.c
index 2222073..1ec0654 100644
--- a/drivers/base/attribute_container.c
+++ b/drivers/base/attribute_container.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(attribute_container_classdev_to_container);
 
 static struct list_head attribute_container_list;
 
-static DECLARE_MUTEX(attribute_container_mutex);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(attribute_container_mutex);
 
 /**
  * attribute_container_register - register an attribute container
@@ -77,9 +77,9 @@ attribute_container_register(struct attribute_container *cont)
 	klist_init(&cont->containers,internal_container_klist_get,
 		   internal_container_klist_put);
 		
-	down(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 	list_add_tail(&cont->node, &attribute_container_list);
-	up(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int
 attribute_container_unregister(struct attribute_container *cont)
 {
 	int retval = -EBUSY;
-	down(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 	spin_lock(&cont->containers.k_lock);
 	if (!list_empty(&cont->containers.k_list))
 		goto out;
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ attribute_container_unregister(struct attribute_container *cont)
 	list_del(&cont->node);
  out:
 	spin_unlock(&cont->containers.k_lock);
-	up(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 	return retval;
 		
 }
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ attribute_container_add_device(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct attribute_container *cont;
 
-	down(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) {
 		struct internal_container *ic;
 
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ attribute_container_add_device(struct device *dev,
 			attribute_container_add_class_device(&ic->classdev);
 		klist_add_tail(&ic->node, &cont->containers);
 	}
-	up(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 }
 
 /* FIXME: can't break out of this unless klist_iter_exit is also
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ attribute_container_remove_device(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct attribute_container *cont;
 
-	down(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) {
 		struct internal_container *ic;
 		struct klist_iter iter;
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ attribute_container_remove_device(struct device *dev,
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	up(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ attribute_container_device_trigger(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct attribute_container *cont;
 
-	down(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) {
 		struct internal_container *ic;
 		struct klist_iter iter;
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ attribute_container_device_trigger(struct device *dev,
 				fn(cont, dev, &ic->classdev);
 		}
 	}
-	up(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -295,12 +295,12 @@ attribute_container_trigger(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct attribute_container *cont;
 
-	down(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) {
 		if (cont->match(cont, dev))
 			fn(cont, dev);
 	}
-	up(&attribute_container_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex);
 }
 
 /**

-- 
Matthias Kaehlcke
Linux Application Developer
Barcelona

     The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily
      exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking
                                                                 .''`.
    using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org  : :'  :
                                                                `. `'`
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4                  `-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/