[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704190058.11625.dtor@insightbb.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:58:10 -0400
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To: johann deneux <johann.deneux@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stenyak@...il.com, linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] Input: ff, add FF_RAW effect
Hi,
On Thursday 19 April 2007 00:25, johann deneux wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> wrote:
> > johann deneux napsal(a):
> > > Jiri,
> > >
> > > Which solution did you chose to implement? From what I remember, we
> > > last discussed Dmitry's idea of specifying an axis for an effect, then
> > > combine several effects to achieve complex effects.
> >
> > I think you mean motor instead of axis, because I don't push real axes to
> > the devices, but motor's torques...
> >
>
> Yes, sorry, I meant motor.
>
I have been thinking about this and I don't think that exporting motor
data is a good idea, at least not in case of Phantom driver. The fact
that there are 3 motors is a hardware implementation detail and it
is not interesting for general application.
My understanding that the end result of controlling these 3 motors
is a force vector (I don't know if there is such english term, this
is a literal translation from russian) applied to user's hand.
If we are interested in using FF API we need to come up with a way
to express this effect without exposing implementation details of
one particular device.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists