[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704191815180.14874@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Dave Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> First of all, today, packet writing on cd/dvd doesn't work well, it is very
> slow because
> now all file-systems are limited to 4k-barrier and cd/dvd can write only
> 32k/64k packets.
> This is why a pktcdvd was written and it emulates those 4k sectors by doing
> read/modify/write cycle
> This cause a lot of seeks and read/writing switches and thus it is very slow.
>
> By introducing a bigger that 4k page cache a dvd/cd can be divided is 64k/32k
> blocks that will be read an written freely
> (Although dvd can read 2k I don't think that reading a 64k block will hurt
> since most of time drive is busy seeking and locating a specific sector)
>
> Now I thinking to implement this in an other way, I mean I want to teach udf
> filesystem to to packet writing on its own, bypassing disk cache (but not page
> cache)
>
> Secondary 32/64k limitation is present of flash devices too, so they can
> benefit too, and I almost sure that future hard disks will use bigger block
> size too.
>
> To summarize I want to tell that bigger pagesize will allow devices that have
> big hardware sectors to work fine in linux.
Great arguments in support of this feature. Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists