[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070420113805.c4877dc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:38:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, oleg@...sign.ru, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on:
>
> (1) The key facility changes. That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be a
> problem to merge unless someone else has put some changes in there that I
> don't know about.
>
> (2) try_to_cancel_delayed_work(). I suppose I could use
> cancel_delayed_work() instead, but that's less efficient as it waits for
> the timer completion function to finish.
There are significant workqueue changes in -mm and I plan to send them
in for 2.6.22. I doubt if there's anything in there which directly
affects cancel_delayed_work(), but making changes of this nature against
2.6.21 might lead to grief.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists