linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/15] ide: make ide_hwif_t.ide_dma_host

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46292464.90403@ru.mvista.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:36:52 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] ide: make ide_hwif_t.ide_dma_host_on void

Hello, once I wrote:

>> [PATCH] ide: make ide_hwif_t.ide_dma_host_on void
 
>> * since ide_hwif_t.ide_dma_host_on is called either when 
>> drive->using_dma == 1
>>   or when return value is discarded make it void, also drop "ide_" prefix
>> * make __ide_dma_host_on() void and drop "__" prefix

>    BTW, it would also make sense to make hwif->ide_dma_timeout() and 
> hwif->ide_dma_lostirq void too (and possibly drop the ide_ prefix). 
> Their results are *explicitly* ignored.

   I've started preparing the patches and found out that aec62xx has completely bogus ide_dma_timeout() -- the same as ide_dma_lostirq() and it doesn't even call __ide_dma_timeout()... :-/
   Don't know whether to deal with this in a separate patch...

MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/