[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4629547D.9090404@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:02:05 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pavel@...e.cz, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.
> > >
> > > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
> > >
> >
> > Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
> >
> > Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?
>
> Shrug, I'm out of ideas. I'm hoping that it'll magically start working
> when people start flushing their git trees for .22
> Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x
> because right now, I'm completely puzzled.
Well, it seemed reliable, but I just got a resume failure. Different
from any previous symptom I've seen:
Intel machine check architecture supported
Intel machine check reporting enabled enabled on CPU#1
Back to C!
<hang>
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists