| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:44:03 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Marcos Pinto <markybob@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: 2.6.20.7 locking up hard on boot On Saturday 21 April 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:34:20PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:30:59PM -0500, Marcos Pinto wrote: > > > Yes, I just tried 2.6.20.3 with ACPI enabled and it booted perfectly. > > > I'm hoping this means you know what's wrong? :-) > > > > Can you do a 'git bisect' on the versions between 2.6.20.3 and 2.6.20.7 > > to try to find the problem patch? > > Considering where it failed and that 2.6.20.3 worked, I would be > extremely surprised if this wasn't one more report of > adjust-legacy-ide-resource-setting.patch breaking booting (and we > already have confirmed reports for this)... > > But AFAIK we still don't understand how this patch managed to break > things. Same here but 2.6.21 is near and we need to do something about this issue. I'm thinking about reverting this patch for 2.6.21-final - having broken X server is better than having broken and not booting kernel. Jan, Alan? Thanks, Bart - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists